BIZTRAC BETA
Computer consultancy and computer facilities management activities

LAYER NULL AS

Org. no. 935264901 Limited company (AS) Sandnes Incorporated 2025 Active
Ownership graph ↗
Revenue NOK 0
Operating profit NOK −11,000
Equity NOK 42,000
Incorporated 2025
Share capital NOK 60,000

Signals

2 flags
  • Driftsunderskudd Siste driftsresultat er negativt (−11k kr).
  • Mangler regnskap Ingen årsregnskap er registrert for selskapet.

LAYER NULL AS is registered as a limited company in Sandnes, Rogaland with organisation number 935264901. The business is classified under computer consultancy and computer facilities management activities (NACE 62.200). The company was incorporated in 2025. Registered share capital is NOK 60,000, divided into 100 shares. The company's stated purpose is: “Investere i aksjer, verdipapirer og andre selskapsandeler samt eiendomsinvesteringer. I tillegg kan selskapet yte rådgivningstjenester.”.

Key figures

Revenue
NOK 0
Operating profit
NOK −11,000
Equity
NOK 42,000
Est. value
NOK 77,000

Financial health · 2025

Liquidity
0.05
Not satisfactory
Current assets ÷ current liabilities
Profitability
Not available
Return on total assets
Solidity
5.0%
Weak
Equity as a share of total capital

Solidity capped at Weak because equity is below NOK 100,000.

Who owns LAYER NULL AS?

ROBERT SANDOR HANNEVIG
LAYER NULL AS
NOK 0 rev. · NOK −11,000 profit

LAYER NULL AS has 1 registered shareholder:

All shareholders and roles →

Which companies does LAYER NULL AS own?

LAYER NULL AS holds a stake in 1 company:

See the full ownership structure →

Frequently asked questions about LAYER NULL AS

Who owns LAYER NULL AS?

ROBERT SANDOR HANNEVIG is the largest registered owner, with 100.0%.

What is the revenue of LAYER NULL AS?

LAYER NULL AS had revenue of NOK 0.

Where is LAYER NULL AS based?

LAYER NULL AS has its business address in Hommersåk.

Source: Biztrac.no · Data from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and the Norwegian Tax Administration · Last updated 15.06.2026.

Report a problem

Found a technical fault, or something wrong in the data? Tell us what happened.