BIZTRAC BETA
Support services to forestry

NØTTERØY VED AS

Org. no. 932910934 Limited company (AS) Færder Incorporated 2024 Active
Ownership graph ↗
Revenue 2025 NOK 421,000
Operating profit NOK −216,000
Equity NOK 23,000
Incorporated 2024
Share capital NOK 30,000

Signals

1 flags
  • Driftsunderskudd 2025 Siste driftsresultat er negativt (−216k kr).

NØTTERØY VED AS is registered as a limited company in Færder, Vestfold with organisation number 932910934. The business is classified under support services to forestry (NACE 02.400). The company was incorporated in 2024. Registered share capital is NOK 30,000, divided into 100 shares. The company's stated purpose is: “Vedproduksjon for salg. Anleggsarbeid og annen offentlig og privat tjenesteyting.”. The most recent filed accounts, for the 2025 financial year, show NOK 421,000 in revenue and NOK −216,000 in operating profit.

Key figures · 2025

Revenue
NOK 421,000
Operating profit
NOK −216,000
Equity
NOK 23,000
Est. value
NOK 248,000

Financial health · 2025

Liquidity
1.09
Satisfactory
Current assets ÷ current liabilities
Profitability
Not available
Return on total assets
Solidity
8.2%
Weak
Equity as a share of total capital

Solidity capped at Weak because equity is below NOK 100,000.

Who owns NØTTERØY VED AS?

BJØRN AGNAR FOYN DAHL
NØTTERØY VED AS
NOK 421,000 rev. · NOK −216,000 profit

NØTTERØY VED AS has 1 registered shareholder:

All shareholders and roles →

Frequently asked questions about NØTTERØY VED AS

Who owns NØTTERØY VED AS?

BJØRN AGNAR FOYN DAHL is the largest registered owner, with 100.0%.

What is the revenue of NØTTERØY VED AS?

NØTTERØY VED AS had revenue of NOK 421,000 in 2025.

Who is the general manager of NØTTERØY VED AS?

Bjørn Agnar Foyn Dahl is registered as general manager of NØTTERØY VED AS.

Where is NØTTERØY VED AS based?

NØTTERØY VED AS has its business address in Nøtterøy.

Source: Biztrac.no · Data from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and the Norwegian Tax Administration · Last updated 15.06.2026.

Report a problem

Found a technical fault, or something wrong in the data? Tell us what happened.