BIZTRAC BETA
Joinery installation

GPP BYGGENTREPRENØR AS

Org. no. 917144001 Limited company (AS) Oslo Incorporated 2016 Active
Ownership graph ↗
Revenue 2024 NOK 1.3m
Operating profit NOK 151,000
Equity NOK 204,000
Incorporated 2016
Share capital NOK 100,000

GPP BYGGENTREPRENØR AS is registered as a limited company in Oslo, Oslo with organisation number 917144001. The business is classified under joinery installation (NACE 43.320). The company was incorporated in 2016. Registered share capital is NOK 100,000, divided into 100 shares. The company's stated purpose is: “Investere i eiendom- og formuesgjenstander, vedlikehold av bygg og eiendom, investere i verdipapirer samt all naturlig tilhørende virksomhet herunder deltakelse i andre selskaper.”. The most recent filed accounts, for the 2024 financial year, show NOK 1.3m in revenue and NOK 151,000 in operating profit.

Key figures · 2024

Revenue
NOK 1.3m
Operating profit
NOK 151,000
Equity
NOK 204,000
Est. value
NOK 567,000

Financial health · 2024

Liquidity
3.14
Very good
Current assets ÷ current liabilities
Profitability
Not available
Return on total assets
Solidity
68.2%
Very good
Equity as a share of total capital

Who owns GPP BYGGENTREPRENØR AS?

GIANNI PIETRO PRACEK
GPP BYGGENTREPRENØR AS
NOK 1.3m rev. · NOK 151,000 profit

GPP BYGGENTREPRENØR AS has 1 registered shareholder:

All shareholders and roles →

Frequently asked questions about GPP BYGGENTREPRENØR AS

Who owns GPP BYGGENTREPRENØR AS?

GIANNI PIETRO PRACEK is the largest registered owner, with 100.0%.

What is the revenue of GPP BYGGENTREPRENØR AS?

GPP BYGGENTREPRENØR AS had revenue of NOK 1.3m in 2024.

Who is the general manager of GPP BYGGENTREPRENØR AS?

Gianni Pietro Pracek is registered as general manager of GPP BYGGENTREPRENØR AS.

Where is GPP BYGGENTREPRENØR AS based?

GPP BYGGENTREPRENØR AS has its business address in Oslo.

Source: Biztrac.no · Data from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and the Norwegian Tax Administration · Last updated 15.06.2026.

Report a problem

Found a technical fault, or something wrong in the data? Tell us what happened.