BIZTRAC BETA
Beauty care and other beauty treatment activities

NO FEM AS

Org. no. 913851641 Limited company (AS) Sunndal Incorporated 2014 Active
Ownership graph ↗
Revenue 2025 NOK 920,000
Operating profit NOK −50,000
Equity NOK −94,000
Incorporated 2014
Share capital NOK 30,000

Signals

2 flags
  • Negativ egenkapital 2025 Bokført egenkapital er negativ (−94k kr).
  • Driftsunderskudd 2025 Siste driftsresultat er negativt (−50k kr).

NO FEM AS is registered as a limited company in Sunndal, Møre og Romsdal with organisation number 913851641. The business is classified under beauty care and other beauty treatment activities (NACE 96.220). The company was incorporated in 2014. Registered share capital is NOK 30,000, divided into 30 shares. The company's stated purpose is: “Drift av hudpleiesalong og andre produkter/tjenester som naturlig hører sammen med dette.”. The most recent filed accounts, for the 2025 financial year, show NOK 920,000 in revenue and NOK −50,000 in operating profit.

Key figures · 2025

Revenue
NOK 920,000
Operating profit
NOK −50,000
Equity
NOK −94,000

Financial health · 2025

Liquidity
0.55
Weak
Current assets ÷ current liabilities
Profitability
Not available
Return on total assets
Solidity
-21.5%
Weak
Equity as a share of total capital

Solidity capped at Weak because equity is below NOK 100,000.

Who owns NO FEM AS?

JANNE NAKKEN
NO FEM AS
NOK 920,000 rev. · NOK −50,000 profit

NO FEM AS has 1 registered shareholder:

All shareholders and roles →

Frequently asked questions about NO FEM AS

Who owns NO FEM AS?

JANNE NAKKEN is the largest registered owner, with 100.0%.

What is the revenue of NO FEM AS?

NO FEM AS had revenue of NOK 920,000 in 2025.

Who is the general manager of NO FEM AS?

Janne Nakken is registered as general manager of NO FEM AS.

Where is NO FEM AS based?

NO FEM AS has its business address in Sunndalsøra.

Source: Biztrac.no · Data from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and the Norwegian Tax Administration · Last updated 15.06.2026.

Report a problem

Found a technical fault, or something wrong in the data? Tell us what happened.